Outdoor Fun
It was a beautiful day here in Central NJ. At lunch time it was sunny and 63F (17C). Time to head outdoors!
I only get an hour for lunch, so I have to squeeze in all I can. The best thing, is that the park near my work QTH is only 5 minutes away. Once I get to the parking lot, it’s only about a 100 yard walk to the picnic table area. So within 10 minutes from exiting the building, I was shooting a line into a tree to get the PAR up in the air.
That went VERY well. I shot the fishing weight over a suitable limb, and the fishing reel fed out the line smoothly and easily. I pulled the antenna up, set up the KX3 and was listening to 20 Meters lickety-split. To my dismay however, 20 Meters seemed – DEAD! What now? I didn’t want to head back so quickly, so I switched over to 40 Meters. As I expected, there wasn’t too much going on there, either. So I cycled the KX3’s band button on up to 17 Meters. Eureka! Stations – LOUD stations – but how would the PAR tune? Since it’s the PAR ENDFEDZ 10/20/40 MKII, it’s really only meant to operate on either 10, 20 or 40 Meters. I hit the KX3’s tune button expecting the worst. I was pleasantly surprised! The tuner brrrrrp’ed for all of about 2 or 3 seconds – not long at all. When you have a really bad situation, the autotuner can grind on for what seems like hours. But it matched the wire rather easily and before long, I was tuning around the band in earnest.
I worked Gun OE3CGU in Austria who has great ears and boundless patience. I doubt I ever worked so hard to give a 599 report. I got a (generous) 339 in return, which I kind of expected. Thanks for your efforts, Gun! From there I decided to call CQ to see what would happen. The response was gratifying, as Mike KD5CB answered my very first CQ. Mike was located in Hillsboro, TX which was kind of neat, as Hillsboro, NJ was all of about 5 miles away from where I was sitting. Mike had a booming 599 plus signal into NJ and I received a 579 in return. Mike was using an IC-7200 at 600 Watts to an 80 Meter Delta Loop. The surprising thing was our respective weather situations. While it was sunny and relatively warm here, Mike was experiencing temperatures in the low 40s (5C) with a good stiff wind. Who would have thought that Texas would have been colder than New Jersey? We spoke for a bit before I had to tear down and head back to work. It just so happened that Mike got his own call to lunch at just the same time. All in all, it was a nice little rag chew.
I love operating from outdoors and I enjoy Jim W1PID’s stories. I can very easily understand why he likes outdoor operating so much. In fact, when you have a routine down and things go well, it’s downright addicting!
To borrow a line from Monty Python, “And now for something completely different!” I’d like to take this opportunity to rant a little. All my readers need to regularly read another blog – N8ZYA’s Radio Blog. If you don’t read John’s blog on a regular basis, you are doing yourself an extreme disservice. If you are a QRPer, his blog (and John K3WWP’s diary and Website) should be considered “Required Reading”. Whenever you run into some smart-alec, know-it-all type who gets into your face with “Life is too short for QRP” or “QRP doesn’t work” or “What can you do with 5 puny Watts – work across town?” comments …… direct them to John’s blog. No stopping, no dilly-dallying ….. right to John’s blog.
Read his post for today – “100 Days of DX”. Then consider the fact that these 100 days of DX contacts were accomplished with an INDOOR random wire antenna with about 3 Watts of power. John’s stats speak for themselves – QRP works and it works well. AND, as a bonus – with enough time and experience, it WILL make you a top notch operator. I could give you the call signs of about 20 – 30 QRPers right off the top of my head, who are all A1 Ops – and if they’re not in the A1 Op Club, they darn well should be.
If you’re a new QRPer …… yes, at times this niche of the hobby may seem daunting. Heck, it might seem darn near impossible to you; but it’s not. Even if QRP is frustrating for you from the beginning, the proof is in the pudding. Never give up – never throw in the towel.
72 de Larry W2LJ
QRP – When you care to send the very least!
A special greeting – A very Blessed Good Friday and a very Happy Easter to all my Orthodox friends who are celebrating the Pascha this weekend!
Larry Makoski, W2LJ, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from New Jersey, USA. Contact him at [email protected].
Two more QRPTTF videos
From Rem K6BBQ – QRPer and videographer extraordinaire:
From KB3ZHX – not strictly QRPTTF, but this video was done on the same day as QRPTTF (mostly Florida QSO Party QSOs – but hey, they counted towards QRPTTF!):
72 de Larry W2LJ
QRP – When you care to send the very least!
Larry Makoski, W2LJ, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from New Jersey, USA. Contact him at [email protected].
A nice way to rest a sore back.
| Relaxing on the deck. |
| New loop to tripod adapter |
Mike Weir, VE9KK, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from New Brunswick, Canada. Contact him at [email protected].
Is the ultimatic Morse keyer really that efficient?
![]() |
| Vintage Ten-Tec Ultramatic Keyer KR50. Nice name but the similarity to ultimatic seems to be coincidental. |
Iambic keying with a dual-lever paddle is by far the most popular form for Morse keying. But in recent years an old alternative has reemerged. This is the Ultimatic mode which goes back to W6SRY in the 1950’s.
The experience seems to be that it needs less timing precision than the iambic mode for letters like A, N, R, and K (· —, — ·, · — ·, — · —). When both paddles are squeezed, the last one to be pressed takes control. So when right-left is pressed one gets a dah followed by dits, not the dah-di-dah-dit of the iambic keyer.
It is very simple to add code for an ultimatic keyer to an iambic one. In recent years this has led to an ultimatic option in some stand-alone keyers, such as:
- Several of the keyers from Jackson Harbor Press, WB9KZY, like the PK-4.
- Several of the newer K1EL keyers, like the K14 which also has modes for dah priority, dit priority, and bug.
- The ultimatic kit from Elektor.
I have yet to hear of a single integrated keyer in a rig that supports the ultimatic mode, and that is probably why from time to time a request for a software upgrade to the Elecraft rigs is sent to the Elecraft reflector. If you really want that, and you don’t want to use a stand-alone keyer, then an alternative is to build the ultimatic adapter for iambic keyers by W9CF. It can be built with two logic ICs or with a microcontroller.
In “Using an Iambic Paddle” Chuck Adams, K7QO, compared the iambic paddle, the single-lever paddle, the bug, and the straight key with respect to number of movements. He counted the number of strokes if all 26 letters of the English alphabet and the numbers from 0 to 9 are sent.
I found it interesting to add to the analysis of K7QO by doing the counting for the ultimatic mode also. There are only 3 letters which have to be sent differently compared to an iambic keyer: P (· — — ·), X (— ·· —), and C (— · — ·). The P and the X are simpler to send with the ultimatic keyer, but the C takes more effort. A table of right and left movements and number of presses is:
Letter | Iambic | Ultimatic |
P | L-R-L = 3 | L-R = 2 |
X | R-L-R = 3 | R-L = 2 |
C | R-L = 2 | R-L-L = 3 |
Straight key: | 132 |
Bug: | 90 |
Single-lever paddle: | 73 |
Iambic mode, dual-lever paddle: | 65 |
Ultimatic, dual-lever paddle: | 64 |
It should be said though that in the ultimatic mode it requires much less coordination to send the letter C as if one is using a single-lever paddle and use four movements. Since three is the maximum number of presses for any letter in iambic mode, this may be one of the reasons why the iambic mode took over. But this was before my time, so I am only speculating.
Now that I have discovered the virtue of the ultimatic mode, I have used my K1EL WinKeyer with ultimatic mode more. I could need the greater tolerance to timing errors. So far I find it hard to remember to send the C differently and have a tendency to end up with a D (— ··) instead. The same goes for the letter Ä or Æ (· — · —) which we use in inter-Scandinavian contacts (as German-speakers also do) and which easily ends up as a W (· ——) instead. I’ll just practice P, X, and in particular C and Ä to build confidence.
Sverre Holm, LA3ZA, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from Norway. Contact him at [email protected].
SOTA IS!!!
So in the vein of Cass, I submit the following
Mike Crownover, AD5A, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from Texas, USA. Contact him at [email protected].
Your first rig
Bob KK4DPN commented on my X1M review, and in addition to asking some questions about the issues I’ve had on some of the bands he states: I’m looking to get into HF and this seems like a good thing to start out with, just to get a feel for it.
As a relatively new Ham myself, I went through what I have started to refer to as the standard Technician progression, or STP. As a newly licensed Tech, I purchased an inexpensive HT. Then, as I got a taste of being able to talk to people, but constant bad-signal reports, I got a mobile antenna for the HT. More repeaters were now within my range, but I was still getting bad signal reports. Next, came a mobile VHF rig, followed by a dual band one. On the HF side, I purchased a 10 Meter mobile, and then a vintage Atlas 210X (as a General).
So many new Hams go through this same progression. There’s a reluctance for some of us to invest $300 in equipment for a new hobby, until we play a bit. For those of us that fit the hobby well, the HTs give us a taste of something better. It’s the same with the HF side. I bought the 10 Meter mobile used for about $100, because it was the only band I could use with my license. Once I had some success with that (my first contact was trans-Atlantic!), I was motivated to get my General ticket.
I’ve mentioned before too, that I like to write about the frugal side of Ham Radio. This is mostly because at this point in my life, I have collected several dependents and obligations that take priority, and partly because, I’m Frugal! (There, I said it). KD2 CHE is the same way with her sewing though.
Thinking along these lines, I’d like to explain why I bought an old Atlas 210X as my first multi-band HF rig. After reading about them, it seemed like a good combination of size, power, cost, and ease-of-use. A good working 210X can go for less than $200, and has a pretty small footprint. Output is 200 Watts PEP (120 on 10M) on sideband. People universally complain about the CW performance, but for now, I’m not using CW. I’ve logged contacts all over Eastern, and Western Europe on the thing, as well as South America, and Western US. Operation is VERY simple, and pretty forgiving of someone with little antenna tuning experience.
My recommendations for an HF rig for a new ham, who doesn’t want to spend a ton of dollars are as follows:
- Don’t buy a QRP rig as your first rig. QRP operation requires some skill, and can be frustrating if you’re just looking to rag-chew, or even just log some interesting stations. Wait until you have a more powerful rig first, and get a little more familiar with HF. I think a QRP rig as your first rig may give you a bad taste of what it’s all about. Don’t get me wrong though. The challenge of QRP is great fun. I guess the analogy is that it would be like going off on a wilderness survival weekend as a first camping trip.
- Go with a decent used rig. There’s lots of great rigs in the $300-500 range at hamfests. If you have some friends with more experience, ask around for recommendations, and look at the eHam reviews. Plan on spending a little extra for a tune-up, and accessories (like a good antenna tuner). 100 Watts will get you started with enough power to talk all over the world. My record so far is Namibia from Long Island.
- If you really want a new rig, there are a few sub-$1000 rigs that get decent reviews. The Alinco DX-SR8T can be picked up for just over $500 from several of the online Ham retailers. The Icom IC-718 runs in the low to mid $700 range, and the Yaesu FT-857D is in the mid $800 range.
- You CAN go even lower than $300 as I did, but your choices are limited. In my case, I have a rig that doesn’t do the WARC bands, and is missing quite a few features that even the lowest priced radios have. I love the simplicity of it though. I can see continuing to use it even after I get something more sophisticated.
As more and more people discover this old pastime, I hope they discover all of the aspects of it. Next for me is digital modes. I’m really looking forward to getting that up and running on the Xiegu X1M, and a Raspberry Pi. More to follow…
Neil Goldstein, W2NDG, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from New York, USA. Contact him at [email protected].
Poor conditons but still worked a few…………..
The next (and final) station I contacted was EA4DRV, being pumped from my last 1 watt contact I tried working this Spanish station with 1 watt. It didn't work out as well and the contact was made eventually with 3 watts. After this contact it was time to flip the switch once again and move on to making lunches, arranging morning work clothes and all that other fun stuff. It goes to show you that even when the propagation is in the dumpers contacts are still there to be had!
Mike Weir, VE9KK, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from New Brunswick, Canada. Contact him at [email protected].


















