Free Shipping for ARRL Members? Not Yet…

Obi Wan Kenobi might have uttered, ‘There’s a positive change in The Force’ these days in Newington. It’s no secret that the ARRL has been suffering from the transition of a career long Chief Officer (Dave Sumner) to a new CEO who can effectively lead the non-profit corporation, also a public charity, which declared a $20.5M net asset figure to the IRS for 2017. The failed interim CEO, Mr. Gallagher, tried to execute an executive style which he perhaps found successful in the financial world but a flop at a non-profit like the ARRL. His retirement after only a brief period in Newington was perhaps best for all involved. I wish him well as a fellow amateur radio operator. He just proved to not be a good fit as CEO of the League.

Obi Wan Kenobi
You’re Our Only Hope!

The realization by President Roderick and the changing Board of Directors that this executive style could not bring success to this transition in executive leadership at the headquarters in Newington CT resulted in the hiring of Howard Michel WB2ITX. He had been at the similar, but the far larger IEEE organization, which operates sort of like the ARRL for engineers and other technologists in the United States. It’s net asset declaration to the IRS in 2017, by comparison, was $415M! But he has shown in the brief time he’s been CEO in Newington that he understands the difference between management and executives in the non-profit world. More to come in a future blog post on that distinction.

At the recent ARRL Board Meeting, Mr. Michel was able to get approval for what seems to me to be a fundamental change in the organizational structure and, hopefully, the culture which drives the some 100 employees of the American Radio Relay League. While I may write more about these fundamental changes that the new CEO has put into action on February 11, 2019, here is synopsis from the League’s website:

‘The Board received the report of ARRL CEO Howard Michel, WB2ITX, who outlined plans to reorganize and refocus the activities at ARRL Headquarters. Michel said providing better value to membership is a top priority, and he sees value creation and value delivery as key components to long-term membership retention and growth.’

ARRL CEO Howard Michel WB2ITX

Better value to membership? Now, that is a mouthful to us members! The operational details of that value proposition will be what members, including former and potential members, will consider and remember. That is, what is the ARRL actually going to do in order for members to see a greater value in their annual dues? They could be convinced with a quick strategic example: offering free shipping & handling on purchases from the ARRL Store to current League members!

Let’s look at this small but important thing of free shipping and handling. As I discussed with Dan Romanchik KB6NU on the ICQ Podcast this week, he and I both are Amazon Prime members. Our British colleague, Martin Rothwell M0SGL, smiled at this recognition during our recording as he works for Amazon across the Pond. Dan and I both stated that we tend to not buy books and related items directly from the ARRL website because of the stiff shipping and handling fees. Instead, Amazon Prime members get free shipping on most items which Dan and I take advantage of with these purchases. So Amazon realizes the retailer’s profit margin from the sale of ARRL products through the Amazon.com website. The League, however, only reaps the wholesaler’s margin.

To be fair, the League does give a few Members Only discounts of, say, $3, off of a $27 book—if the League publishes the book. (Note that the League also resells RSGB publications so they probably have those price arrangements locked in without much margin to discount.) And, there are periodic discounts sent out to members via postcard or email advertisements. I’ve found that they only amount to relieving me of the net shipping charge. I cannot use any other additional discounts such as the annual Birthday Discount that I get during my birthday month. As a certified ARRL Instructor, I get a discount on some purchases but I cannot use any of these other discounts. All of this complexity adds up to the member just using Amazon Prime or just not buying a book or other product on impulse. The moment of excitement passes.

I’m a retired Editor-in-Chief for Springer Media, a very large scientific publisher based in The Netherlands. I ordered all the textbooks in my college bookstore as a student worker back in the early 1970s. In between, I launched two peer-reviewed scientific journals, edited others, and negotiated publication relationships with several major publishers. I’ve been an editorial consultant to a dozen or more textbook publishing houses. So I come at this from decades of experience in the publishing industry, not just the consumer side of publishing. So let’s look at typical publisher (wholesaler) and book reseller (retailer) relationships. Many hams may not realize the pricing structures in place worldwide on book publishing.

But the ARRL will ‘lose’ money by offering free shipping and handling to members, right? I can certainly hear Marketing Manager Bob Interbitzen NQ1R saying that upon hearing this idea. Perhaps not. They may actually make more money. Amazon is a major bookseller (an understatement if there ever was one). The typical wholesale discount to a retail book seller is 55%. Large retailers might get 60% while the independents buying them for 40% of the stated retail price. Thus, the ARRL sells Amazon and perhaps others these books at a greatly reduced wholesale price but not when the point-of-sale is through the ARRL Store on their website.

“The typical wholesale discount to a retail book seller is 55%.”

I do not know what the ARRL’s financial terms with Amazon or other retailers is. But it is highly unlikely that it differs substantially from these industry norms. After all, amateur radio operators are hardly a significant market for Amazon to break with their acquisition norms for retailing. I wish it were different but it’s not. The actual financial relationship that the League has with it’s retailer on books and other items could be something very, very different. I want to acknowledge that. But, if it is, that’s another issue. Moreover, shouldn’t that information be made known to the membership?

So, if the ARRL could do something to stimulate more direct sales to members from their website, they would recoup the wholesale discount to Amazon on each of those sales, right? What could drive more members away from Amazon (especially Prime members) and back to the League’s Store?

If CEO Howard Michel’s intention is to increase value to League members, giving them free shipping and handling because they are members would do that. And, it would do that in a tangible and visible way to the entire membership of some 150,000 out of the 750,000 or so license holders in the U.S. Trading out the typical 55% wholesale discount to Amazon (and other retailers) to increase the value of membership would actually result in a higher profit margin to the League, all things being equal. Mr. Michel would indeed qualify as the Obi Wan Kenobi of the ARRL should he bring this about. The League should, at least, run honest numbers on this change to see what the financial impact might be on current revenue.

The business of increasing the value of membership in the American Radio Relay League: that would be a good deal. And a good deal for both members and the League itself!”

But it would also be like a lightning strike to ensure that the membership sees and believes that this reorganization of the ARRL Headquarters means business. The business of increasing the value of membership in the American Radio Relay League: that would be a good deal. And a good deal for both members and the League itself!

Will they do this? I don’t know. But your telling CEO Michel and your Division Director that it’s what you want would help get it on their minds. And having the CEO and Board of Directors listening to you hams, whether you’re a current member or not, is definitely a good deal!

Frank Howell, K4FMH, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from Mississippi, USA. Contact him at [email protected].

14 Responses to “Free Shipping for ARRL Members? Not Yet…”

  • David WB4ONA:

    Here we go again… There is no such thing as FREE shipping! One way or another, you pay for it in the end.

  • Craig - N7LB:

    All Amazon Prime members pay a yearly fee (I believe it’s now up to $119 USD) to qualify for “free” shipping, which begs the question – If you pay $119 a year to belong to Amazon Prime, are you really getting free shipping?

  • Goody K3NG:

    $25 book + $6 shipping: HELL NO!
    $31 book + free shipping: YEAHHHHHHHH!

  • Eric:

    I gotta say. Sure free shippin’ ain’t free but it sure makes us feel good and goes a long way in gettin’ that sale completed. I agree with op in that it really can’t be wrong and not only will pat our membership on the back and add value to being a member but may actually increase some sales. I call upon the leadership to do a cost-benefit analysis and figure this out and get crackin’. This seems to me to be a no brainer. I would also like to acknowledge that when they crunch the numbers it may not work. I can understand that. I would like them to come forward and tell us why. I believe they can not only be honest about why but be completely 100% open too.

  • David Wilcox K8WPE:

    I only belong to the ARRL because it is the only voice out there protecting my frequencies and hobby. Having said that I never order books from the ARRL due to the high shipping charges. I usually buy the books from Amazon because I already have an Amazon Prime membership for other things, ARRL books or not. So the ARRL shipping charges are an impediment to my direct purchases. I always re up my membership at Dayton to get a free book. Their coupons that I receive in the mail aren’t enough to cause a sale either.

    In summary, free shipping would be a direct benefit to me and to other hams who do not have Prime memberships. I would support that. Also we must not forget that without the ARRL fighting for our frequencies WHO would be out there in our corner?

    I do enjoy the ARRL magazines. CQ still struggles to exist and has consolidated to just one rag. 73 and Ham Radio are history. Even my favorite QRP Quarterly is getting thinner. Anything the ARRL can do to increase the value or even “perceived” value would be a boon. Everyone wants to do their own thing but sometimes the only way to success is in numbers.

    73. Dave K8WPE

  • Jeff, KE9V:

    Just a point of reference, a one year (non-student) membership to IEEE is $205. I’ve been a member for most of my working career but my employer has always paid my dues. Same goes for my colleagues. I assume that a lot fewer of us would remain IEEE members if we had to pay that out of our own pockets. It’s unfair to compare the net worth of these dissimilar organizations.

    As for shipping charges, it’s obvious that most of those commenting have never purchased technical manuals. Amazon may offer “free” shipping on the latest White House tell-all or on paperback teen fantasy thrillers, but no one else on this planet sells technical manuals with “free” shipping.

    If you don’t want to pay for shipping, purchase the books at local hamfests. Expecting HQ to publish a wide variety of technical manuals and then throw in shipping for free marks the amateur radio community a collective of skinflints. I always thought that was just cliche, but perhaps not? I can’t help but notice that almost every suggestion for increasing membership has been about money – make dues less, offer cheaper dues for certain age groups, offer free membership for new licensees, offer free shipping, etc.

    It’s as though many believe the ARRL is hoarding warehouses of cash.

    Jeff, KE9V

  • Gary KD8GLS:

    I stopped joining win the dues went to 50 bucks I’m on a fixed income and it just unrealistic

  • Glenn W9IQ:

    I think you are right on point, Frank. The only unknown from our vantage point is how many books ARRL sells through Amazon verses direct. But for increasing the “value of membership”, free shipping for members has merit.

  • Tim 4X1ST:

    I’ll maybe take some stick for this, but still…

    As a young UK amateur in the late 70s, the ARRL Handbook was one of my most prized possessions. But that was 40 years ago.

    In 2019, should physical book publishing and retail be one of the ARRL’s main activities?

    Can’t be many hams who don’t have internet access or would have a problem downloading the content as PDFs…

  • Herbert Heller K3DE:

    Shipping is just a part of the total ‘value judgement’. The effect is profound on small items like their ARRL calendar. One does judge a book (technical or otherwise) on its shipping cost!

    I would concern more about shallowness of some recent articles … a recent is more about selling the writers own ‘book’ and gratuitous reference to science by popularizing a science gadfly who propagandizes the Climate Change/Global Warming issue.

  • Al Massaro KF5SMH:

    I was a member of the ARRL for the first five years after I got my license. I have to admit the work done to insure that the amateur bands are protected and expanded where needed done by the organization is invaluable. The books/manuals are pricey in my estimation and consequently the free shipping possibility would improve their value and appeal. However, I left the organization because I just did not feel it was a worthwhile investment FOR ME overall.

  • N0OZG:

    ARRL member for over 18 years. Free shipping in this day and age is the norm. Some retailers have a min. purchase about, $35.00, for free shipping. That is one vender that I use, and do not purchase when it is not free shipping. A suggestion is another membership level, as a donation? Not a raise to all to keep it affordable. Maybe an additional $20 or $30?

  • Rush, W4QA:

    Good post. The net idea here is that members would reap more value if they were able to purchase items directly from the ARRL, at a lower overall cost, than buying elsewhere. Makes sense to me… I’m sure there are challenges with implementing that given the long term relationship the League has with places like HRO, etc. — they’d essentially be competing with their marketplace partners. Times have changed dramatically however, are continuing to evolve in regards to publishing, learning, and consuming inoformation… and the ARRL needs to change with it or lose its leadership role with amateur radio.

  • Ted Harris N6kp:

    I just received my 40 year pin from ARRL. Probably could add another 10 years since I used to read QST in the library. Re free shipping. If the numbers work out why not?
    QST is going downhill with articles that are not worth the $49 membership. I keep membership going for the work they do to keep our frequencies.

Leave a Comment

Subscribe FREE to AmateurRadio.com's
Amateur Radio Newsletter
News, Opinion, Giveaways & More!

E-mail 
Join over 7,000 subscribers!
We never share your e-mail address.



Also available via RSS feed, Twitter, and Facebook.


Subscribe FREE to AmateurRadio.com's
Amateur Radio Newsletter

 
We never share your e-mail address.


Do you like to write?
Interesting project to share?
Helpful tips and ideas for other hams?

Submit an article and we will review it for publication on AmateurRadio.com!

Have a ham radio product or service?
Consider advertising on our site.

Are you a reporter covering ham radio?
Find ham radio experts for your story.

How to Set Up a Ham Radio Blog
Get started in less than 15 minutes!


  • Matt W1MST, Managing Editor




Sign up for our free
Amateur Radio Newsletter

Enter your e-mail address: