The reverse beacon network is KILLING ME!!!!!
| The loop horizontal and nothing. |
Mike Weir, VE9KK, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from New Brunswick, Canada. Contact him at [email protected].
Two new DXCC today
Paul Stam, PC4T, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from the Netherlands. Contact him at [email protected].
A couple of things from the mail bag.
A new video (quite well done) that you may want to keep on hand for showing to those who have or are expressing a deisre to become an Radio Amateur.
First, here’s the link to the full version (which is a bit longer than what is embedded here): http://youtu.be/ivUMIADFSDw
Next, from Jim W4QO considering the current “Buddies in the Caribbean” DXpedition to St. Lucia:
In order to step up the pace here in St. Lucia, if you (running QRP @5 cw/dig or 10 PEP SSB) work 3 of the 7 ops on the Buddies in the Caribbean DXpediton this week, you can earn the coveted BIC QRP certificate. It’s not the Buddies who have to be running QRP – it’s YOU! Many of us are running QRP
but some are not.
http://dx-world.net/2013/st-lucia-buddies-in-the-caribbean-dxpedition/
Sadly, Joe didn’t make it so you only have to work 3 of the other 7 using QRP to earn this valuable certificate.
We have worked many of you QRPers already so how hard can it be? Find 3 of us on any band, any mode.
To find us, go to this easy link:
http://www.dxwatch.com/dxsd1/dxsd1.php?f=3647
The Buddies are the ones with a J6/ in front of their calls. There are still 3.5 more days to do this, so come on, work us!
Send a #10 envelope with SASE to W4QO at qrparci.org with a list of the 3 (or more) you worked. If you work 5 or more, well, just wait and see what you get!! 🙂
If you worked J6/W4QO, then include your QSL card and get one in return.
73,
Budd, J68FF #6260
Chris, J6/W6HFP #15226
Rick, J6/AA4W #4046
Craig, J6/NM4T #8137
Jim, J6/W4QO #6515
John, J6/W5EXJ #15219
Jerry, J6/N9AW #6694
Lastly, I thought this announcement from the League regarding the Communications Act of 1934 was of interest:
SB QST @ ARL $ARLB033
ARLB033 Plans Announced to Update the Communications Act of 1934
ZCZC AG33
QST de W1AW
ARRL Bulletin 33 ARLB033
From ARRL Headquarters
Newington CT December 5, 2013
To all radio amateurs
SB QST ARL ARLB033
ARLB033 Plans Announced to Update the Communications Act of 1934
The US House Communications and Technology Subcommittee has announced plans for a multi-year effort to examine and update the Communications Act of 1934, the overarching law under which the FCC functions. The subcommittee, part of the US House Energy and Commerce Committee, is chaired by Oregon Republican Greg Walden, W7EQI. Walden and Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Fred Upton of Michigan made the announcement December 3.
“Today we are launching a multi-year effort to examine our nation’s communications laws and update them for the Internet era,” Upton said in a news release. “The United States has been the global leader in innovation and growth of the Internet, but unfortunately, our communications laws have failed to keep pace.”
ARRL CEO David Sumner, K1ZZ, noted that the most recent significant update of the Communications Act was in 1996. “Under the leadership of Greg Walden, the subcommittee and its staff are well equipped to take up the challenge,” Sumner said. “The ARRL will be monitoring the work closely as it goes forward next year and beyond.”
The plan was made public via Google Hangout, where the committee leaders were joined by former FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell, who said he was “delighted” to learn of the update plans. Upton explained that the process, to start in 2014, will involve a series of white papers and hearings focusing on what might be done “to improve the laws surrounding the communications marketplace as well as a robust conversation utilizing all platforms of digital media.” He suggested a bill would be ready by 2015.
Walden said, “A lot has happened since the last update” and that the Communications Act is “now painfully out of date.” He pointed out that the Act, drafted during the Great Depression, was last updated “when 56 kilobits per second via dial-up modem was state of the art.”
Upton said, “We must ensure that our laws make sense for today but are also ready for the innovations of tomorrow.”
Walden said he wants to open the discussion to input from everyone. Interested parties may follow the plan’s progress via Twitter. “It’s important for people to have an opportunity to weigh in,” he said. “This is really a public process to get better public policy.”
Call me a pessimist, but I hope we’re not opening Pandora’s Box here.
72 de Larry W2LJ
QRP – When you care to send the very least!
Larry Makoski, W2LJ, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from New Jersey, USA. Contact him at [email protected].
Amateur Radio Newsline Report 1895 December 6 2013
- Four youngsters get their names in space thanks to ham radio
- Rewrite of the Communications Act may begin in 2014
- ARRL files erratum to its "symbol rate" rule making petition
- DHS will be giving emcomm training at the 2014 Dayton Hamvention
- VHF Communications magazine ceases publication after 45 years
- Youngsters on the Air Operating month comes to IARU Region One
Baofeng UV-B6: 144/432MHz for under £30 – you can’t really say no!
My Baofeng UV-5R has been an unqualified success. I’ve always liked it as a simple, no-nonsense handheld. Since the summer, connected to my Elk hand held yagi, it has become my satellite transceiver of choice for making contacts on SO-50.
As I have commented before, I have enough handhelds really. However, Sunday night saw me on the Handy Radio website (a UK based vendor of Chinese handheld radios and accessories) looking around for an after market antenna to stick on my tiny Baofeng UV-3R. I couldn’t help but notice the Baofeng UV-B5 on sale at £28.99. It would have been silly not to, really.
Tim Kirby, G4VXE, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from Oxfordshire, England. Contact him at [email protected].
Afghanistan
Paul Stam, PC4T, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from the Netherlands. Contact him at [email protected].
The best of the Baofeng handhelds
How do the cheap Baofeng handhelds compare? I have had the Baofeng UV-5R since I bought it from the 409shop in April 2012, but recently I noticed that the UV-B5, UV-B6, and UV-82 have appeared on the market also. If I should need another handheld transceiver for VHF/UHF, is there any advantage in getting any of the other models?
I prepared the following table in order to highlight differences and similarities. Bold characters signify an improvement for what I conceive to be typical radio amateur use.
Feature | ![]() UV-5R | ![]() UV-82 | UV-B5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front-end | OK | OK | Improved |
| Antenna | Short | Longer | Longer |
| Signal meter | On/off | On/off | Dynamic |
| Squelch | VHF: On/off UHF: Tiny steps 21. Dec 2013 | As the UV-5R 21. Dec 2013 | Larger steps |
| Size and shape | Square and small | Fits better in hand, larger buttons | Fits better in hand |
| Frequency/channel change | Up/down | Up/down | Rotary encoder |
| VFO/MR button | Yes | Turn radio off, then press menu as you turn it on 3. Jan 2014 | Yes |
| Band button | Yes | No (in menu) | Switches automatically |
| Dual PTT button | No | Yes | No |
| Programming | Need a computer to enter alpha tags | Alpha tags can be entered from keyboard | Alpha tags can be entered from keyboard |
| Memory channels | 128 | 128 | 99 + 16 for FM radio |
| Display | 7 characters in name | 7 characters in name | Harder to read, only 5 characters in name |
| Modifications | Enlarge mic hole, (and here), Low modulation mod | – | Unused button as background light switch |
My main sources are the blogs of PD0AC (UV-82, UV-B5/B6) and the Miklor FAQs
In general I think the design of much radio equipment is lagging behind other electronics when it comes to user interfaces. Imagine a smart phone user interface on a handheld! That is why I emphasize user interface issues in my final evaluation.
I like the improved front-end, signal meter, and squelch of the UV-B5 making it a strong contender for the winner position. But I don’t think they are worth the price of a poorer display. On the other hand, the UV-82 is inferior in my view to the UV-5R due to the need to enter the menu for VFO/MR and band switch functions. So for now I’ll stick with the UV-5R.
Sverre Holm, LA3ZA, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from Norway. Contact him at [email protected].



















